Corneal biomechanics are not exclusively compromised in high myopia.

INTRODUCTION: Research assuming linearity has concluded that corneal biomechanics are compromised in high myopia. We investigated whether this assumption was appropriate and re-examined these associations across different levels of myopia. METHODS: Myopic (spherical equivalent refraction, SER ≤ -0.50 D) eyes of 10,488 adults aged 40-69 years without any history of systemic and ocular conditions were identified in the UK Biobank. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was employed to test the linear association between corneal hysteresis (CH) or corneal resistance factor (CRF), separately, and SER while controlling for age, sex, corneal radius and intraocular pressure. Quantile regression (QR) was used to test the same set of associations across 49 equally spaced conditional quantiles of SER. RESULTS: In OLS regression, each standard deviation (SD) decrease in CH and CRF was associated with 0.08 D (95% CI: 0.04-0.12; p < 0.001) and 0.10 D (95% CI: 0.04-0.15; p < 0.001) higher myopia, respectively. However, residual analysis indicated that the linearity assumption was violated. QR revealed no evidence of a significant association between CH/CRF and SER in low myopia, but a significant (p < 0.05) positive association became evident from -2.78 D (0.06 and 0.08 D higher myopia per SD decrease in CH and CRF). The magnitude of association increased exponentially with increasing myopia: in the -5.03 D quantile, every SD decrease in CH and CRF was associated with 0.17 D (95% CI: 0.08-0.25; p < 0.001) and 0.21 D (95% CI: 0.10-0.31; p < 0.001) higher myopia. In the -8.63 D quantile, this further increased to 0.54 D (95% CI: 0.33-0.76; p < 0.001) and 0.67 D (95% CI: 0.41-0.93; p < 0.001) higher myopia per SD decrease in CH and CRF. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal biomechanics appeared compromised from around -3.00 D. These changes were observed to be exponential with increasing myopia.

Analyzing the changing trend of corneal biomechanical properties under different influencing factors in T2DM patients.

To analyze the changing trend of CH and CRF values under different influencing factors in T2DM patients. A total of 650 patients with T2DM were included. We discovered that the course of T2DM, smoking history, BMI, and FBG, DR, HbA1c, TC, TG, and LDL-C levels were common risk factors for T2DM, while HDL-C levels were a protective factor. Analyzing the CH and CRF values according to the course of diabetes, we discovered that as T2DM continued to persist, the values of CH and CRF gradually decreased. Moreover, with the increase in FBG levels and the accumulation of HbA1c, the values of CH and CRF gradually decreased. In addition, in patients with HbA1c (%) > 12, the values of CH and CRF decreased the most, falling by 1.85 ± 0.33 mmHg and 1.28 ± 0.69 mmHg, respectively. Compared with the non-DR group, the CH and CRF values gradually decreased in the mild-NPDR, moderate-NPDR, severe-NPDR and PDR groups, with the lowest CH and CRF values in the PDR group. In patients with T2DM, early measurement of corneal biomechanical properties to evaluate the change trend of CH and CRF values in different situations will help to identify and prevent diabetic keratopathy in a timely manner.

The Effect of Diabetic Retinopathy and Blood Glucose Regulation on Corneal Biomechanical Parameters.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and metabolic control of blood glucose levels on corneal biomechanical parameters. METHODS: Diabetic patients were categorized into three groups: no DR group, nonproliferative DR (NPDR) group, and proliferative DR (PDR) group. Of the 141 eyes examined, 40 belonged to the control group, 34 to no DR group, 34 to NPDR group, and 33 to PDR group. Using an Ocular Response Analyzer to measure corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc). IOP was assessed using a Tono-Pen, while central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined using an ultrasonic pachymeter. HbA1c levels were also recorded. We conducted comparisons among these groups across biomechanical parameters and IOP (tonopen), and CCT, while also investigating the impact of HbA1c levels on these parameters. RESULTS: Among any groups show a statistically significant difference in CCT, IOP (tonopen), CH, CRF, IOPg, and IOPcc. In diabetic patients, CRF, CTT, and IOPg values were significantly higher in those with HbA1c levels ≥ 7 mg/dl than in those with HbA1c levels < 7 mg/dl (p = 0.009, p = 0.013, p = 0.038), respectively, while there was no statistically significant difference in IOPcc, CH, and IOP (tonopen). Linear regression analysis showed that CH was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and negatively associated with IOPcc (p < 0.001), while CRF was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001), HbA1c (p < 0.05), and negatively associated with diagnosis of DR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the influence of metabolic control, as reflected by HbA1c levels, on corneal biomechanical parameters in diabetic patients, emphasizing the importance of monitoring and managing glycemic control in this population.

Corneal Hysteresis as a Marker for Patients with Secondary Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the association of corneal hysteresis (CH) in patients with secondary glaucoma to control patients and patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Additionally, to determine the consistency of CH measurements in patients with secondary glaucoma. METHODS: A total of 84 patients (121 eyes) were prospectively included in this study. Twenty-three patients (46 eyes) were healthy controls, 24 patients (40 eyes) were diagnosed with POAG, and 27 patients (35 eyes) were diagnosed with a form of secondary glaucoma. CH and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Three measurements per eye were performed and used for the analysis and to determine fluctuations in CH data. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis and Chi-Squared testing was done to determine differences between groups. RESULTS: All patients were matched for age. Patients in both POAG and secondary glaucoma groups were matched for age and IOP. All groups had similar sex and racial compositions as well as similar proportions of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. CH was lower (p < .05) in patients with POAG (9.32 ± 1.64) and secondary glaucoma (7.89 ± 3.18) when compared to healthy controls (11.16 ± 1.60). Fluctuations in CH measurements were minimal in all groups. Further analysis of the secondary glaucoma group revealed no differences in CH between different types of secondary glaucoma (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with secondary glaucoma have lower CH when compared to POAG or control groups. The ORA exhibits precision of CH measurements for control, POAG, and secondary glaucoma groups, making it a reliable tool in management of secondary forms of glaucoma.

Keratoconus cone location influences ocular biomechanical parameters measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer.

BACKGROUND: Keratoconus is characterized by asymmetry in the biomechanical properties of the cornea, with focal weakness in the area of cone formation. We tested the hypothesis that centrally-measured biomechanical parameters differ between corneas with peripheral cones and corneas with central cones. METHODS: Fifty participants with keratoconus were prospectively recruited. The mean ± standard deviation age was 38 ± 13 years. Axial and tangential corneal topography were analyzed in both eyes, if eligible. Cones in the central 3 mm of the cornea were considered central, and cones outside the central 3 mm were considered peripheral. Each eye was then measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) tonometer. T-tests compared differences in ORA-generated waveform parameters between cohorts. RESULTS: Seventy-eight eyes were analyzed. According to the axial topography maps, 37 eyes had central cones and 41 eyes had peripheral cones. According to the tangential topography maps, 53 eyes had central cones, and 25 eyes had peripheral cones. For the axial-topography algorithm, wave score (WS) was significantly higher in peripheral cones than central cones (inter-cohort difference = 1.27 ± 1.87). Peripheral cones had a significantly higher area of first peak, p1area (1047 ± 1346), area of second peak, p2area (1130 ± 1478), height of first peak, h1 (102 ± 147), and height of second peak, h2 (102 ± 127), than central cones. Corneal hysteresis (CH), width of the first peak, w1, and width of the second peak, w2, did not significantly differ between cohorts. There were similar results for the tangential-topography algorithm, with a significant difference between the cohorts for p1area (855 ± 1389), p2area (860 ± 1531), h1 (81.7 ± 151), and h2 (92.1 ± 131). CONCLUSIONS: Cone location affects the biomechanical response parameters measured under central loading of the cornea. The ORA delivers its air puff to the central cornea, so the fact that h1 and h2 and that p1area and p2area were smaller in the central cone cohort than in the peripheral cone cohort suggests that corneas with central cones are softer or more compliant centrally than corneas with peripheral cones, which is consistent with the location of the pathology. This result is evidence that corneal weakening in keratoconus is focal in nature and is consistent with localized disruption of lamellar orientation.

Corneal Biomechanical Measures for Glaucoma: A Clinical Approach.

Over the last two decades, there has been growing interest in assessing corneal biomechanics in different diseases, such as keratoconus, glaucoma, and corneal disorders. Given the interaction and structural continuity between the cornea and sclera, evaluating corneal biomechanics may give us further insights into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, progression, and management of glaucoma. Therefore, some authorities have recommended baseline evaluations of corneal biomechanics in all glaucoma and glaucoma suspects patients. Currently, two devices (Ocular Response Analyzer and Corneal Visualization Schiempflug Technology) are commercially available for evaluating corneal biomechanics; however, each device reports different parameters, and there is a weak to moderate agreement between the reported parameters. Studies are further limited by the inclusion of glaucoma subjects taking topical prostaglandin analogues, which may alter corneal biomechanics and contribute to contradicting results, lack of proper stratification of patients, and misinterpretation of the results based on factors that are confounded by intraocular pressure changes. This review aims to summarize the recent evidence on corneal biomechanics in glaucoma patients and insights for future studies to address the current limitations of the literature studying corneal biomechanics.

Particular Anatomy of the Hyperopic Eye and Potential Clinical Implications.

Background and Objectives: Hyperopia is a refractive error which affects cognitive and social development if uncorrected and raises the risk of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). Materials and Methods: The study included only the right eye-40 hyperopic eyes in the study group (spherical equivalent (SE) under pharmacological cycloplegia over 0.50 D), 34 emmetropic eyes in the control group (SE between -0.50 D and +0.50 D). A complete ophthalmological evaluation was performed, including autorefractometry to measure SE, and additionally we performed Ocular Response Analyser: Corneal Hysteresis (CH), Corneal Resistance Factor (CRF); specular microscopy: Endothelial cell density (CD), Cell variability (CV), Hexagonality (Hex), Aladdin biometry: Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD), Axial Length (AL), Central Corneal Thickness (CCT). IBM SPSS 26 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean age of the entire cohort was 22.93 years (SD ± 12.069), 66.22% being female and 33.78% male. The hyperopic eyes had significantly lower AL, ACD, higher SE, CH, CRF. In the hyperopia group, there are significant, negative correlations between CH and AL (r -0.335), CRF and AL (r -0.334), SE-AL (r -0.593), ACD and CV (r -0.528), CV and CRF (r -0.438), CH (r -0.379), and positive correlations between CCT and CH (r 0.393) or CRF (r 0.435), CD and ACD (r 0.509) or CH (0.384). Age is significantly, negatively correlated with ACD (r -0.447), CH (r -0.544), CRF (r -0.539), CD (r -0.546) and positively with CV (r 0.470). Conclusions: Our study suggests a particular biomechanical behavior of the cornea in hyperopia, in relation with morphological and endothelial parameters. Moreover, the negative correlation between age and ACD suggests a shallower anterior chamber as patients age, increasing the risk for PACG.

Relationship between Inter-Eye Asymmetries in Corneal Hysteresis and Visual Field Severity in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

This study investigated the influence of asymmetric corneal hysteresis (CH) on asymmetric visual field impairment between right and left eyes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) without a history of intraocular surgery. CH, corneal resistance factor (CRF), and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Differences between the eyes (right eye-left eye: DIFRL) and CH-based and in target parameters (higher CH eye-lower CH eye: DIFCH) were calculated in the same patient. In 242 phakic eyes of 121 patients, older age (p < 0.001), lower CH (p = 0.001), and lower CRF (p = 0.007) were significantly associated with worse standard automated perimetry (SAP) 24-2 mean deviation (MD). The DIFsRL in axial length (p = 0.003), IOPcc (p = 0.028), and CH (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with the DIFRL in SAP24-2 MD, but not in central corneal thickness (CCT), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) measurement, and CRF. When dividing the patients into two groups based on the median of the CH DIFsCH (0.46), the DIFsCH in CRF (p < 0.001), IOPcc (p < 0.001), CCT (p = 0.004), SAP24-2 MD (p < 0.001), and SAP10-2 MD (p = 0.010) were significantly different between the groups. Large inter-eye asymmetry in CH is an important explanatory factor for disease worsening in patients with POAG.

Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.

INTRODUCTION: Corneal biomechanical properties could affect intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanical properties of various types of glaucoma, assess their effect on IOP measurements. METHODS: This is an observational clinical study of 486 subjects including 102 normal subjects, 104 ocular hypertension (OHT), 89 normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and 191 high tension glaucoma (HTG). Corneal biomechanical parameters were measured using an ocular response analyzer. The main parameters assessed were corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated pressure measurement (IOPg), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). Ultrasound pachymetry was used to measure central corneal thickness (CCT). IOP was measured by a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and a noncontact tonometer (NCT). Visual field (VF) and refractive status were also recorded. Results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Multiple comparison by analysis of variance showed significantly lower CH and CRF in NTG compared to HTG, OHT, and normal subjects (CH: 0.011, 0.015, and 0.033; CRF: 0.001, <0.001, and 0.042, respectively). CRF and CH associated with IOP were measured using either GAT, NCT and IOPcc-GAT, IOPcc-NCT, yet CCT was not. GAT correlated strongly with IOPg (r = 0.79; p < 0.001) and IOPcc (r = 0.77; p < 0.001), but limits of agreement between the measurements were poor. CH and CRF were both negatively correlated with VF change (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CH and CRF affect the measurement of IOP and were related to types of glaucoma or severity of glaucoma. Pure CCT should not be used to correct IOP values or estimate the risk of disease.

Correlation between Interocular Asymmetry of Corneal Hysteresis and Visual Field Defect in Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between interocular asymmetries of corneal hysteresis (CH) and visual field defects in Korean patients with glaucoma. METHODS: A total of 444 eyes from 222 participants with glaucoma in at least one eye were enrolled. CH was measured using an ocular response analyzer (Reichert Technologies Inc). Eyes of each participant were classified into "better eye" and "worse eye" based on the mean deviation (MD) value of visual field test. The correlation between interocular differences in intraocular pressure, axial length, central corneal thickness, CH, and MD values was evaluated using Spearman correlation analysis. To exclude the possible effect of antiglaucoma medication on corneal properties, additional analyses were performed on eyes without any glaucoma treatment at the time of CH measurement (treatment-naive group). RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) MD value was -3.71 dB (-6.87 to -1.30 dB) in the better eye and -10.20 dB (-16.32 to -5.62 dB) in the worse eye. When the correlation between the asymmetry of the MD value and asymmetry of intraocular pressure, axial length, central corneal thickness, and CH were evaluated, only interocular differences in CH were significantly associated with interocular differences in MD values (rho = 0.214, p = 0.001). Among the 222 participants, 60 (27.0%) were treatment-naive group. In these eyes, interocular differences in CH were also significantly associated with interocular differences in the MD values (rho = 0.285, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The interocular asymmetry of CH was significantly correlated with the interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in glaucoma.

Corneal Hysteresis for the Diagnosis of Glaucoma and Assessment of Progression Risk: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the current published literature on the utility of corneal hysteresis (CH) to assist the clinician in the diagnosis of glaucoma or in the assessment of risk for disease progression in existing glaucoma patients. METHODS: Searches of the peer-reviewed literature in the PubMed database were performed through July 2022. The abstracts of 423 identified articles were examined to exclude reviews and non-English articles. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 articles were selected, and the panel methodologist rated them for level of evidence. Eight articles were rated level I, and 5 articles were rated level II. The 6 articles rated level III were excluded. RESULTS: Corneal hysteresis is lower in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, primary angle-closure glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, and pseudoexfoliation syndrome compared with normal subjects. Interpretation of low CH in patients with high intraocular pressure (IOP) or on topical hypotensive medications is complicated by the influence of these parameters on CH measurements. However, CH is also lower in treatment-naïve, normal-tension glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects who have a similar IOP. In addition, lower CH is associated with an increased risk of progression of glaucoma based on visual fields or structural markers in open-angle glaucoma patients, including those with apparently well-controlled IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal hysteresis is lower in glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects, and lower CH is associated with an increased risk of disease progression. However, a causal relationship remains to be demonstrated. Nevertheless, measurement of CH complements current structural and functional assessments in determining disease risk in glaucoma suspects and patients. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Evaluation of the corneal biomechanical properties and corneal thickness in patients with Graves' orbitopathy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties and central corneal thickness in patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO). METHOD: A total of 132 eyes of 66 patients with GO and 108 eyes of 54 healthy subjects were enrolled. Eyes with GO were classified as high score clinical activity score (CAS, ≥ 3) (Group 1, n = 64) and low CAS score (< 3) (Group 2, n = 68). Corneal biomechanical parameters [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF)], Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc) levels were measured with Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean CH values were found as 9.6 ± 1 mmHg in Group 1, 10.2 ± 0.9 mmHg in Group 2, and 11.4 ± 1.7 mmHg in the Control Group (p < 0.001). In post hoc analysis the mean CH was significantly lower in Group 1 than Group 2 and Control Group (Group 1-Group 2, p < 0.001; Group 1-Control Group, p < 0.001). The mean CRF was found as 10.5 ± 2.1 in Group 1, 10.4 ± 2.2 in Group 2, and 10.43 ± 2.0 in the Control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in CRF measurements (p = 0.959). The mean IOPcc values were found as 17.1 ± 3.6 mmHg in Group 1, 15.8 ± 4.0 mmHg in Group 2 and 15.2 ± 4.1 mmHg in the Control Group. The IOPcc and IOPg measurements between all groups were statistically significant (p = 0.009, p = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal biomechanical measurements were different in the GO patients with varying CAS scores compared to healthy individuals.

Effect of Corneal Hysteresis on the Rates of Microvasculature Loss in Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between corneal hysteresis (CH) and rates of optic nerve head whole image capillary density (wiCD) loss over time in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Observational cohort. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-four eyes (122 OAG and 52 glaucoma suspect eyes) from 112 patients over more than 2 years and 4 visits or more. METHODS: Baseline CH measurements were acquired with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Linear mixed-effect models were designed to investigate the effect of CH, average intraocular pressure (IOP) during follow-up, and baseline visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) on the rates of wiCD loss and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thinning over time, while adjusting for confounders. Interaction between CH or baseline MD and average IOP during follow-up were included in final models to evaluate the effect of baseline MD or average IOP during follow-up on structural changes for different values of CH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Effect of CH, IOP, and baseline MD on the rates of wiCD loss and cpRNFL thinning over time. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 3.9 years. In the multivariable model, non-Black race, higher average IOP during follow-up, lower baseline CH, lower baseline VF MD, and higher numbers of IOP-lowering medications were associated with faster rates of wiCD loss over time. For CH values 6 mmHg and 12 mmHg, every 1-mmHg increase in average IOP during follow-up was associated with 0.23% per year faster and 0.07% per year slower rates of wiCD loss over time, respectively. While every 1-mmHg decrease in CH was associated with 1.89% per year faster rate of wiCD loss for MD of -12 dB, it was associated with 0.81% per year faster rate of wiCD loss for MD of -3 dB. CONCLUSION: Lower CH values were significantly associated with faster rates of wiCD loss over time. In eyes with lower CH, both higher average IOP during follow-up and more severe glaucoma damage at baseline were associated with faster rates of wiCD loss and cpRNFL thinning. These results support CH as a useful parameter for risk assessment of glaucoma progression. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

A Review of Corneal Biomechanics and Scleral Stiffness in Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy for Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The mechanism of action underlying prostaglandin analog (PGA) therapy involves changes in the expression of different metalloproteases to increase permeability of the sclera and allow increased aqueous humor outflow through this alternative drainage pathway. This alteration of structure impacts cornea/scleral biomechanics and may introduce artifact into the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the clinical setting. METHODS: A literature search reviewing the impact of PGA therapy on corneal and scleral biomechanics was conducted including basic studies, clinical studies with treatment naïve patients, and a clinical study examining the cessation of PGA therapy. Additional literature including engineering texts was added for greater clarity of the concepts underlying ocular biomechanics. RESULTS: One study with an animal model reported significant corneal stiffening with PGA treatment. Most longitudinal clinical studies examining the effects of initiation of PGA therapy in PGA naïve subjects failed to report biomechanical parameters associated with stiffness using the Corvis ST and only included those parameters strongly influenced by IOP. One study reported a significant reduction in scleral stiffness with IOP as a co-variate, highlighting the need to account for the effects of IOP lowering when assessing clinical biomechanics. The report of cessation of PGA therapy on corneal biomechanics showed no change in corneal compensated IOP after 6 weeks, raising the question of reversibility of the PGA-induced structural alteration. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the findings in several clinical studies may merely reflect a reduction in IOP, further studies are warranted using Corvis ST parameters associated with corneal and scleral stiffness. The gold standard for IOP measurement in the clinical setting is Goldmann applanation tonometry, a technique previously shown to be affected by corneal stiffness. Since PGA therapy has been reported to alter not only scleral biomechanics, but also corneal biomechanics, it is essential to consider alternative tonometry technologies in the clinic.

Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement in different types of Graves' orbitopathy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the ocular biomechanical properties of inactive Grave's orbitopathy (GO) patients and healthy subjects and to evaluate the influence of severity and phenotype of GO on these parameters. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. All included inactive GO patients and healthy controls underwent complete ocular examination, including Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal biomechanical analysis using Ocular Response Analyser (ORA), and corneal epithelial thickness analysis using Optovue. Patients with inactive GO were classified based on the severity and orbital phenotype (predominantly myogenic or lipogenic). Comparison among groups was performed. RESULTS: 60 eyes from 30 inactive GO patients and 30 healthy eyes were examined. Corneal hysteresis (CH) was significantly lower in inactive GO patients (9.6 [p25 8.1; p75 11.2]) compared to controls (10.4 [9.8; 11.5]) (p = 0.012). In GO patients, cornea compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) was significantly higher than Goldman applanation tonometry IOP (IOP-GAT) (p = 0.001). A total of 13.3% GO patients were initially classified as having ocular hypertension (OHT; defined as IOP > 21 mmHg with no signs of glaucomatous optic neuropathy) based on IOP-GAT measurement. According to IOPcc, 27.8% of GO patients were classified as OHT. In GO patients, no differences were found in corneal bimechanical properties according to the disease severity or orbital phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: CH is significantly lower in inactive GO patients compared to healthy subjects. ORA corrected IOP was significantly higher in GO patients compared to IOP-GAT. No differences in corneal biomechanical properties between mild and moderate-to-severe GO disease and between myogenic and lipogenic orbitopathy were found.

[Long-term clinical and functional outcomes of high myopia correction by femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of an intrastromal ring]. / Otdalennye kliniko-funktsional'nye rezul'taty korrektsii miopii vysokoi stepeni metodom intrastromal'noi implantatsii kol'tsa s femtolazernym soprovozhdeniem.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze remote clinical and functional outcomes of correcting high myopia in patients with thin cornea by the method of femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of intracorneal implant MyoRing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 22 patients (22 eyes; the mean age of study patients was 30.2±5.37 years). Mean spherical equivalent (SE) of refraction was -11.52±1.96 D, cylindrical component (cyl) of refraction was -2.04±1.64 D, minimal pachymetry index in the center was 491.6±20 µm, corneal hysteresis (CH) amounted to 8.6±1.19 mm Hg. The average pupil diameter in mesopic conditions was 5.6±0.23 mm. All patients had a history of mild amblyopia. The follow-up period lasted 2 years. RESULTS: Two years after the surgery uncorrected visual acuity was 0.6±1.22, corrected visual acuity 0.7±0.20. Mean spherical equivalent (SE) of refraction was 0.61±1.43 D, cylindrical component of refraction was -0.13±0.5 D. Predictability of SE within ±0.5 D was recorded in 84% of cases, ±1.0 - also in 84% of cases. Index of safety was 1.16, index of efficacy - 1.0. CH was 9.5±0.03 mm Hg. Mean pachymetry at the center did not change statistically significantly after the surgery in comparison to the initial data (p=1.00). CONCLUSION: MyoRing implantation is an effective and safe method, which ensures correction of the spherical component of refraction, as well as correction of astigmatism, improvement of biomechanical properties of the cornea, and an increase in corneal hysteresis (p=0.01).

Corneal Behavior during Tonometer Measurement during the Water Drinking Test in Eyes with XEN GelStent in Comparison to Non-Implanted Eyes.

Biomechanics of the cornea have significant influences on the non-contact measurement of the intraocular pressure. The corneal behaviour during tonometry is a fundamental factor in estimating its value. The aim of the study was to analyse the behaviour of the cornea during tonometric measurement with the forced change in intraocular pressure during the water drinking test. Ocular Response Analyser (Reichert) was used to the measurement. Besides four basic parameters connected with intraocular pressure (IOPg, IOPcc) and biomechanics (corneal hysteresis CH and corneal resistance factor (CRF), other parameters representing the behaviour of the cornea during a puff of air were analysed. There were 47 eyes included in the study, including 27 eyes with a XEN GelStent implanted and 20 without it. The eyes of people with monocular implementation were the reference group. The values of analysed parameters were compared before and after 10, 25, 40, and 55 min after drinking the water. The intraocular pressure increased by 2.4 mmHg (p < 0.05) for eyes with a XEN stent and 2.2 mmHg for eyes without a stent (p < 0.05) in the tenth minute after drinking of water. This change caused a decreasing of corneal hysteresis (p < 0.05) without significant changes in the corneal resistance factor (p > 0.05). Corneal hysteresis changed similarly in the reference group and the group with a XEN GelStent. The analysis of additional parameters showed a difference in the behaviour of the cornea in eyes with a XEN GelStent in comparison to the corneas of eyes without a stent. This was particularly visible in the analysis of the cornea's behaviour during the second applanation, when the cornea returns to its baseline state after deformation caused by air puff tonometry.

Corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, penetrating keratoplasty, and phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and phacoemulsification (PE). METHODS: This prospective study included 138 eyes which underwent PK (26 eyes), DSAEK (26 eyes), PE (57 eyes), and 29 normal eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and central corneal thickness (CCT) and axial length by ultrasound. The ocular response analyzer was used to measure corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-related IOP (IOPg), and cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc) preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At baseline, PK group had the lowest CH and CRF. There was a significant increase in CH and CRF to normal values in PK (P = 0.015 and 0.006) and PE (P = 0.005 and 0.0001) groups over the study period. At 6 months, CH and CRF increased and reached normal values in the PK group; increased to a lower level than normal in the DSAEK group; and, after an initial reduction, increased to normal values in the PE group. At 6 months, DSAEK group had the lowest CH and CRF. There was a significant positive correlation between CRF and GAT (r = 0.281, P = 0.009), IOPg and GAT (r = 0.335, P = 0.001), and IOPcc and GAT (r = 0.282, P = 0.001). CH was negatively correlated with age (r = - 0.189, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Corneal biomechanical factors increase after DSAEK and PK. At post-operative month six, they reach normal values in PK group, but are lower than normal in DSAEK group.

Corneal Hysteresis, Intraocular Pressure, and Progression of Glaucoma: Time for a "Hyst-Oric" Change in Clinical Practice?

It is known that as people age their tissues become less compliant and the ocular structures are no different. Corneal Hysteresis (CH) is a surrogate marker for ocular compliance. Low hysteresis values are associated with optic nerve damage and visual field loss, the structural and functional components of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Presently, a range of parameters are measured to monitor and stratify glaucoma, including intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and the ganglion cell layer (GCL), and subjective measurement such as visual fields. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current evidence that CH values area risk factor for the development of glaucoma and are a marker for its progression. The authors will explain what precisely CH is, how it can be measured, and the influence that medication and surgery can have on its value. CH is likely to play an integral role in glaucoma care and could potentially be incorporated synergistically with IOP, CCT, and visual field testing to establish risk stratification modelling and progression algorithms in glaucoma management in the future.

Modification of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy.

Changes in the cornea can influence outcomes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). We aimed to evaluate the relevance of changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients undergoing non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with the Esnoper V2000 implant® (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Gasteiz, Spain). We included 42 eyes of 42 patients with POAG scheduled for NPDS with the Esnoper V2000 implant. Biomechanical properties were measured by Ocular Response Analyzer® G3 (ORA; Reichert Inc., Depew, NY, USA). Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) were measured the day before surgery and on day 1, 7, and 30 and 2 and 3 months after surgery. CH initially increased, fell below the presurgical value at 30 days after the surgery, and increased again at 2 and 3 months. CRF, IOPcc, and IOPg decreased on the first day after surgery, then followed a trend of increasing but stayed below pre-surgery levels. All values reached statistical significance. While observed changes in corneal biomechanics after NPDS and Esnoper V2000 implant were significant, more studies are needed if we are to understand their influence on corneal biomechanics and their clinical relevance in POAG.